In what he calls a "snapshot" of James Dickey in The Writer's Voice (1973), George Garrett has written, "Legends, myths, fables and fabliaux, anecdotes, quotations from, hard and funny sayings, true and false, wheel and flock about him, a shrill invisible halo of birds explosively circling the edges of his wide-brimmed Warner Brothers sheriff's hat, the one he probably sleeps in (they say). No, not once upon a time an ad man for nothing at all ...." All the talk and writing about Dickey's being "The Unlikeliest Poet," as Life magazine dubbed him in 1966, all the good-ol'-boy carousing, the reminiscences of football, track, and World-War-II-and-Korea fighter-pilot adrenalin, all the hoopla of his public appearances and the grand roaring splash of Deliverance (1970, 1973)--book and movie--cannot obscure the accomplishment of this looming man poet. In "Under Buzzards," Dickey's speaker, facing a terrible diminution because of diabetes and proscriptions about drinking, explains with surprising calm, "How the body works how hard it works / For its medical books is not / Everything: everything is how / Much glory is in it. ..." And the glory came early in Dickey's career: six years after his first collection appeared in Poets of Today VII (1960), he won the 1966 National Book Award for Buckdancer's Choice (1965); four years after that, his novel Deliverance made him famous almost beyond the hopes of any American poet. Writing for Triquarterly (Fall 1978) about his experiences as editor of Quarterly Review of Literature, Theodore Weiss recalls corresponding in t he late 1950s "with the young James Dickey, encouraging him in his obviously distinctive, powerful poetry and advising him--foolishly, as it turned out--to continue (since he and his poetry were doing so well) as an advertising writer rather than take a teaching position. He had told us he required $25,000 a year, his then salary. Out of our long academic experience we believed the expectation of such a salary in teaching was pure fantasy. We had not reckoned with Dickey's personality, did not know his talents as a public reader and performer. In good American style, he proved that even poetry can be made to pay."
Despite all the glory and fortune proceeding from the world of best-selling novels and movies, Dickey has persisted in his claims that "Poetry is ... the center of the creative wheel: everything else is actually just a spinoff from that: literary criticism, screenplays, novels, even advertising copy." But one must not think that Dickey's idea of poetry is only a linguistic exercise: "I dislike the hell out of the notion of poetry or the poem as a kind of a lab subject laid up on the seminar table like a dead cat in a biology lab to be dissected all with a great steaming up of glasses." As Dickey resists academic torpor, he also refuses even to be bound strictly to what others might construe to be The Truth: "The poet is not trying to tell the truth; he's trying to make it, and he tries to make a different version of it from the official version that God made or the world made." He reports that it was under the tutelage of Monroe K. Spears at Vanderbilt that he first came to understand "the creative possibilities of the lie." Nonetheless, a poet must make his poems from something recognizable as language, and he must find some tenable relationship with the world around him, as well as within.
For Dickey, as he recounts in the autobiographical Self-Interviews (1970), to be an artist is also to be entrenched in the active life. Echoing Wordsworth's theory of poetry, he calls the poet "the intensified man," believing strongly in the pursuit of "wholeness." With that aggressive hold on reality, Dickey has been a football player in high school and at Clemson College, a track-record holder at Vanderbilt, a hunter with bow and arrow, a guitarist (both twelve-and six-string) with a flair for bluegrass music, a fighter-bomber pilot in World War II, and a training officer in the Korean War. Other than poetry and fiction, his occupations have included teaching, lecturing, acting (the redneck sheriff in Deliverance), and a six-year stint with advertising firms in Atlanta and New York. In 1961, having received a Guggenheim Fellowship, Dickey went to Europe, leaving advertising behind forever (except in his own literary interests, which he masterfully orchestrates). Since deciding on a literary career, Dickey has held teaching and writer-in-residence positions at Rice University, Reed College, San Fernando State College, the University of Wisconsin, George Mason University, and is presently Carolina Professor of English at the University of South Carolina. He has been broadly honored by critics and the public press, and his national recognition reached honorific peaks with his two-year appointment as Poetry Consultant to the Library of Congress, 1966-1968, and his televised reading of "The Strength of Fields" at the Inauguration celebration for Jimmy Carter in 1977. Dickey's oratorical skills, perhaps inculcated by a lawyer-father who read speeches aloud to his older son (Dickey has one younger brother), have marked him as one of the finest public readers of his own poetry since Dylan Thomas took the nation by storm in the 1950s.
Dickey's early poetry begins with reasonably familiar themes, so it is accessible
even as it leads to new ground. The first volume, Into the Stone
(1960), contains poems about nature, with special attention to the infusion of natural feelings,
skills, instincts, and energies into people. In these poems, the human
being often acts acquisitively toward nature to gain nonhuman or ur-human powers;
thus, mystery and ritual abide with ghostly presences, often the poet's
brother Eugene, without whose death at six of spinal meningitis, Dickey
speculates, he himself might never have been conceived by his mother, whose
angina pectoris greatly darkened any prospects of childbirth.
Oddly, despite many allusions to the poet's own family, the typical voices of Into the Stone
are remote and detached. (Recalling Dickey's Vanderbilt and Sewanee Review connections, one might
compare the austere, elegant diction and the aloof tone of such Fugitive/
Agrarian poets as John Crowe Ransom and Allen Tate.) In
"The Underground Stream," for
example, the
speaker lies at the edge of a well, seeking how his spirit could fall deep
into the earth through the stream and then come to some reconciliation with
his dead
brother, who seems to want to "claim his grave face / That mine might live
in its place." This activity is inward, mystical and personal, although the poet's
imaginative direction is downward--a significant fact in view of two later poems, "Falling" (1967), in which the central consciousness
is that of a doomed airline stewardess; and the latest long poem, The Zodiac (1976),
in which the poet on earth aspires upward to redesign the zodiac. Eerily
and fearsomely the dead brother in "The Underground Stream" merges
with the speaker, and the mystical-natural
fusion extends itself in another poem, "The String," to include
the speaker's son: "Except when he enters
my son,/ The same age as he at his death, / I cannot bring my brother to myself."
The whole spirit of a man is always to include the spirits of the whole family.
Precise, well-focused war poems
like "The Jewel" and "The Enclosure" recapitulate
Dickey's sense
of survivorship and reiterate his apprehension of otherness in human experience, that intuition of connectedness and of spiritual
immanence which later comes to rich and various poetic flower in "Drinking
from a Helmet," "The Being," "Encounter in the
Cage Country," "May Day Sermon," and "Madness." "Walking on Water" and other poems in Into the Stone
flirt with physical experiences which are illusory but imperative to Dickey's
convictions about the human potential for mystical, energized realizations,
as in "Near Darien":
Dickey's effort to achieve mystical unity with nature comes to one
sort of climax with "The Heaven of Animals," in which Dickey
describes the fearless passion and mystic perfection
of killer and prey that his nature's animals
must surely come to. Drowning with Others
is notable for, among other things, the
movement in the nature poems away from plant life to animate, rather than vegetative,
creatures: "A Dog Sleeping on My Feet," "Listening to
Foxhounds," and "The Movement of Fish."
In this second volume, Dickey also experiments with complex, multi-voiced narration,
especially in the three-part work, "The Owl King."
The first part, included in Into the Stone
as "The Call," is about a father looking for his lost
son. The second part is the voice of the owl king, and the third, that of
the blind child who is physically and metaphysically lost in the forest. The poem
is somewhat like Theodore Roethke's "The Lost Son," but the overt presence of a
Mentor, the necessity
of some guidance for mortal beings, is a prepossession for Dickey, who comes
out of a pervasively Christian Southern background. "The Owl King" has religious overtones
that Roethke is able to work without in his own initiation-adolescence poem;
he dispenses with the need for a father-nature-god leader and protector, insisting
that the self has within it the forces to sort and to learn from nature.
In Dickey's sequence, it is conspicuous that the poet was not satisfied with the speaker
of the first part, the father, who begins:
In section 2 of Drowning with Others,
Dickey tries to deal more fully
with the prisoner theme as a speaker finds himself literally "Between
Two Prisoners" and thus is able
to assimilate and report the experiences of others and himself, coming to
that kind of peculiarly Dickeyesque fusion of selves so powerfully worked
later in "Drinking from a Helmet," "Slave Quarters," and "The Firebombing." This aesthetic viewpoint, with
the speaker self-consciously observing, knowing that he has a perspective
that is momentary and unique, that the time and the place are special, that
the voice of the visionary observer is the only one to deal
with the striking matter before him, emphasizes Dickey's dedication to art,
to the exploration of the creative process, especially with regard
to the use of narrative voice under special, extreme conditions. The
theme appears another way in "In the Lupanar at Pompeii," in
which the dead bodies of the Pompeii victims are caught
in a life-in-death frieze peculiarly biased for the overtones of lust and condemnation
that persist throughout, as though the whole scene were not accident but,
rather, retributive and exemplary art-making by some great Artist in the Volcano.
The title poem, "Drowning with Others," is reminiscent
of the sort of nature poems that dominate Into the Stone,
especially "The Other," which rides on an image of
the winged and radiant dream god, what Dickey calls in a recently
published essay (1979) "the energized man."
Non-American history is rarely treated in Dickey's poetry prior to The Zodiac. Nonetheless, "Dover: Believing
in Kings,"
which James Wright, in his correspondence with Dickey over several years,
admires frequently and in great detail, employs a complex, symphonic structure
to touch and to assimilate the history of England for this American Georgian:
"The Hospital Window"
represents this extension of Dickey's familial subject matter. The father
is not close but in a distant hospital window; thus, the son's reaction is
more objective than the speakers' in the mystical Into the Stone poems. A poem
in Drowning with Others is likely
to have a more conventional narrator, who observes,
rather than being caught and moved by an experience as though some actual
power of the thing over there has become active
precisely because he is the perceiver over here.
Such expansiveness through and beyond the family is also evident in part 4
of Drowning with Others, as "The Magus," "Facing Africa," and other poems persist in
exploring worldly experiences in broader terms than North Georgia boys
usually know. The book ends with three poems, "The Salt Marsh," "Inside the River," and "In the Mountain Tent," which
are reminiscent in subject
matter and technique of those in Into the Stone.
In the third volume, Helmets
(1964), Dickey's final poem, "Drinking from a Helmet," could
hardly have lodged between the same covers with the war poems
of the two earlier collections. In those poems the identity of the
self is never really found in terms of anyone else, especially not anyone
so nameless and mysterious as the person this poem describes. The stuff of myth and tall-tale-telling
is in Dickey's legendary Donald Armstrong; in the war poems
of Helmets,
what shakes the reader is the sense, not of the heroic or the exemplary, but
of the uncontrollable, the world that stands behind this world, the transcendent
world that is immanent, pervasive in the works of James Dickey. There are spirits
out there and within, and they are active--animated.
Certain poems in Helmets are
explicitly aesthetic in their execution and theme, forcing
the reader to recognize particular artistic effects which might otherwise
be artfully concealed: poems about art, poems about the formal imaginative act.
In "A Folk Singer of the Thirties," a Christ-like
artist is nailed to a boxcar and sent on archetypal
missions by a cretinous world of RR agents and local police. The poem
is an exercise in the manipulation of authorial point of view,
stepping out into a vision of the whole world, scenes far broader
and more multifarious than one's own backyard ("Sleeping Out at Easter") or tree house ("In the Tree House at Night"), however mythic
and mystical,
spiritual and ancestrally evocative such experiences might have been at any
time in Dickey's earlier career. "The Beholders"
is also explicitly aesthetic; the two lovers together
are the first-person plural voice of the poem:
Two poems in Helmets, "The Being" and "The Ice Skin," suggest works to come
later,
like "Pursuit from Under" (1964)
and "The Shark's Parlor" (1965),
in which the energy of unknown natural creatures elicits spiritual insight
possible to human beings from blood-encounters with god-in-nature, the almost Coleridgean immanent spirit
which is always frightening and truly dangerous. Even "Kudzu," which is ostensibly just another nature poem
with power to spare, is about "something under"--the snakes--the seemingly
malicious world that in another context sets Captain Ahab off on terrible
pursuits of his own. Dickey's safe-seeming speaker is to some extent threatened
by the vines tapping on his window and the possibility that his cattle
might be bitten by the snakes concealed in the kudzu. But when neighbors come for the
ritualistic rooting out of vines and serpents, they seem as fierce
as the natural problems; and the allies--the pigs, turned loose into the foliage
for their ferocious hunt--are entirely horrifying, the flung snakes falling like
so much confetti, far less terrible now than the unstoppable swine.
Helmets ends with three war poems,
but they are two-thirds old hat: "The Driver," very like "The Jewel"
except that the tread of death is heavy upon the speaker; and "Horses and Prisoners," which recalls both "Trees and Cattle" (Into the Stone)
and "Between Two Prisoners" (Drowning with Others).
What is new
is "Drinking from a Helmet,"
a poem
of mystical communion as in a seance, with an object at hand capable of mediating
between the seeker (in this case, not even a very purposeful seeker) and some
spirit-person who has heretofore never known the narrator. In this poem
Dickey deals freshly with the "subtle brotherhood" Stephen Crane refers to
in "The Open Boat" (1898): the
spiritual union of hard-pressed survivors. It is important that this poem
concludes Helmets, but almost equally
important is that it leads directly to the
first poem of Dickey's next book, Buckdancer's Choice: "The Firebombing."
While "Drinking from a Helmet"
gives the reader a chance to see Dickey's mysticism beginning to pull away
from the set of images drawn from his immediate family, "The Firebombing" leads the reader to understand the
social breadth of Dickey's work--a dimension that has been denied by critics
such as Robert Bly. In "The Firebombing" and in the concluding poem
of Buckdancer's Choice, "Slave Quarters," Dickey makes genuine efforts
to deal with moral issues: in "The Firebombing" the questions
of personal and societal guilt over acts of war along with,
perhaps more appallingly, the feelings of
guiltlessness familiar to patriotic warriors; and in "Slave Quarters," the questions of guilt over slavery
compounded by sexual abuse. As Dickey has come to identify with the other soldier
in "Drinking from a Helmet,"
he has, in "The Firebombing,"
come to recognize the need for the question, "Who is my neighbor?" The moral
indignation that might flood so readily for artists and thinkers flows less
surely and less fleetingly for one whose life has depended upon a certain
screening out of moral subtleties in times of actual combat. The "luxury" of moral pangs seems to
come upon the fighter-pilot in "The Firebombing" only after
his war is over,
his safety and his family's restored to allow the contemplation of distant
and not-to-be-altered acts of horrible proportion.
"The Firebombing" is a poem
of empathy, realization, ineffectual good will, and regret. It is in part
a result of Dickey's own experiences in the air force and
his poetically restrained revulsion at those experiences. The mechanics of war stress objectivity (consider "megadeaths," for instance),
but such objectivity comes to appall the civilian codes of Dickey's narrator,
who opens his eyes in a pantry and suddenly knows about napalm jellies crawling
over the things of everyday America. The "aesthetic" distance between the
pilot and the "target area" raises questions about the etherealization of
art, but the chief impact still comes from the immediate inhumanity of war:
Probably the richest technical rewards of "The Firebombing"
are from Dickey's merging of past and
present, twenty-year memories, fleeting images seen from the
plane itself. "Starve and take off / Twenty years in the suburbs," he says,
suggesting "take off pounds" and "take off in a plane." The poem's force is
redoubled by the egregious blindness of people whose morality is softened
by material comfort. The evocative parallels of "sitting in a glass treasure-hole
of blue light" and "eating figs in the pantry / Blinded by each and all /
Of the eye-catching cans" suggest the fatal seclusion of the mind within the
very atmospheres that condition it, the blue fantasy-glory of war and the glittering
satiety of American consumerism. The poem strives for resolution, but it is
more the resolution of Billy Budd
than of In Memoriam, the painful
acceptance of expediency. Transcending the "dull
narcotics" of "sad mechanic exercise," this poem becomes its own apology and partial
expiation: "Absolution? Sentence? No matter; / The thing itself is in that."
Part 2 of Buckdancer's Choice
begins with the title poem, about the poet's
mother and her final illness, a time in which it is appropriate to reminisce and to envision aesthetic pleasures, the scenes of song
and dance, the whistling of the breath that now seems so precious, but the
mother is other than the speaker's self, one who is separate, though kin.
The section continues with poems that deal in other "others," persons
and glimpses, suggesting that the speaker is the perceiver and therefore the
creator. "Faces Seen Once," "Them, Crying,"
and even "The Celebration,""Them, Crying," all deal with parts of persons, with eyes, or cries, or accoutrements,
to represent the fragmentary quality of human perception and at the same time
the con-fusing of single, disparate elements accomplished by the human imagination.
The poem
about parents in this section, "The Celebration,"
is an exclamation of joy at the discovery
of images and memories. The time of wondering and self-seeking,
of pursuit of the identity in terms of the family past, is
pretty much over in Dickey's work. The recollection remains,
as Buckdancer's Choice is dedicated
to "Maibelle Swift Dickey and Eugene Dickey life-givers,"
but now (Dickey past forty at the time) the
family is less specifically the subject matter, less the overt influence upon
the poet
than the self that the poet has evolved in his adulthood, the vision he has accomplished
to carry him through the rest of his days. The debt of direct, personal, familial
gratitude is satisfied, and more independent musings lie ahead.
Such independence is reiterated by "The Shark's Parlor,"
in which the speaker, although young, is
engrossed in his physical efforts, his particular and unique apprehension
of death,
and his camaraderie with the good ol' boys of the beach area he recounts.
Together, they all try to tug a monstrous shark into the light of civilized scrutiny,
but the thing wrecks the interior of the house, smashing pictures of the speaker
and fan-mag movie stars, tearing loose nails and spilling blood, eventually
to be let go again, white belly showing, into the dark, mentionless ocean depths. Fittingly, "Pursuit from Under,"
the story of the killer whale pursuing Arctic
explorers from beneath the ice, follows, to begin part 3.
Dickey's efforts to bring experience to the necessary imaginative boil
urge him to find the subject of "Fathers and Sons" in terms
that are third-person, in feelings that are more and
more distant from the immediate claims of his own family. In the first section, "The Second Sleep," the father imagines
himself as a dream-deer, but there is little reason for the reader to strive
to identify Dickey himself with that kind of fatherly persona. His interest
lies in exploring the various possibilities open to men in general; of course,
the characteristics may be identified with some of Dickey's, but in these
later poems, James Dickey has turned his attention from his esoteric
experience, his own personal family, to situations and characters who are
purposely not Dickey himself or who stand as surrogates, as aesthetic "others"
instead of mystical spirits lingering in the transcendent world of our world,
waiting for the right poem-human to reveal themselves to. So, the poet treats rather
straight-forwardly such characters as "Mangham," his former
teacher, and in "Angina," his mother again, whose deepest image
in Buckdancer's Choice is in soft
focus
(as parents are never entirely accessible to their children). Part 3 of Buckdancer's Choice
closes with a truly bizarre poem, "The Fiend,"
in which a voyeur, who is an everyday-type
guy, climbs into a tree to peer into a tempting window. He somehow merges
with the natural objects, the tree particularly, the keys in his pocket sexually
rising, the whole scene a nightmarish reverie of the man who cannot have the
woman he lusts after, but whose visual pursuit of her is so real to him
that the threats in his own mind are close to murder. At different stages,
he momentarily gains physical/spiritual identity with nature--he
is birdlike, animal-like, treelike. The aesthetic exercise is something like
a perversion
of "The Vegetable King," which
is also based on fertility impulses, but which has a kind of religious purity about
it for its well-known archetypal overtones. "The Fiend," on
the other hand, allows no nonsense--the voyeur
is real; his fantasies are almost truly physical in their imagination, and
there exists the serious threat that the man might one day in his great need
actually commit murder. The identity with nature in this case, unlike so many of Dickey's
earlier poems, points up how vulnerable the human animal is to dangerous
impulses when the civilized veneer is punched through by some compulsive desire.
But the very last poem in Buckdancer's Choice , "Slave Quarters," is about great sexual need in a society
which at least implicitly condones the activity, even the eventuality of progeny.
A slave
master may, with proper discretion and consideration for his wife's knowledge
and feelings, bear his sex upon his woman slaves and cause
them to bear his children. The effect Dickey accomplishes in juxtaposing "The Fiend" and "Slave Quarters" is quite stunning;
one man, society would
brand as perverse and dangerous; the other, society would once have frowned
or snickered at, even though the exploitation and the degradation are equally heinous,
perhaps even more so because of the manifest result--that is, the master's
child, one whom he may not acknowledge.
Dickey's overtly aesthetic sense persists in the "Falling"
section of Poems 1957-1967
(1967). Part 1 is
Dickey's second "Reincarnation" poem, but rather
than the creature's being a lowly crawler,
the deadly snake of "Reincarnation (I)"
in Buckdancer's Choice, this one
is a sea bird, a momentarily ungainly figure, wallowing
in its unease at having found its formerly human spirit in a feathered body.
The bird's state of mind modulates from the human until, in long
and often hesitant lines, Dickey tells us of natural joy in flight
and instinctual purpose. Certain of his earlier poems prefigure pieces in this volume,
but in "Falling" the clarity
and intensity of "The Sheep Child," "Power and Light,""Adultery," and "Encounter in the Cage Country" represent an achievement with
new poems
rarely matched by poets who decide at some point to publish "collected poems."
"Falling," with its adjunct
piece, "May Day Sermon to the Women of Gilmer County, Georgia, by a
Woman Preacher Leaving the Baptist Church,"
at the beginning of the book, has been disparaged by some critics, including
Paul Ramsey, for looseness of diction, rambling syntax, and sensationalistic imagery.
In fact, though, poems like "Falling"
and "The Sheep Child" stand
among the finest of Dickey's two major nature poems--"May Day Sermon,"
which uses fairly conventional biblical and archetypal
images to portray springtime life forces and their drive through the bodied
sensibilities of a dissident woman preacher with her female congregation
in Gilmer County; and "The Sheep Child," which is the most
radical expression of Dickey's sense of transcendence
in fusing man and nature to achieve, if not "some imperishable bliss," as Wallace Steve
ns longs for in "Sunday
Morning,"
at least, for Dickey, "imperishable vision."
The airline stewardess in "Falling," who accidentally
falls from a plane to her death
in a field in Kansas, is enormously alive as she hurtles through space, removing
her clothes and imagining that she makes love in furious, death-defying
motion toward fertile farms and sensuous farm people who
must in their blood understand even such a strange, naked ritual. Hers is
a dance all the way to death; she makes a poem of her last life and a fertility prayer
of her last breath: "AH, GOD--." In "Falling" there is
a kind of functional waste of images, a sprawling sensation
that proceeds from a very broad imagistic base, setting the reader free from the
over-intensity that modernist poetry espouses. Dickey provides" 'the
big basic forms'--rivers, mountains, woods, clouds, oceans, and the creatures
that live naturally among them" (Babel to Byzantium). There is a mass of almost
unassimilated fertility imagery: the moon; virgin sacrifice;
Asherah; planting festivals; the "whores / Of Wichita"; farmer's wives;
daughters urgent and sons erect in the night; "Widowed farmers whose
hands float under light covers to find themselves / Arisen at sunrise"--all
of these are in the figure of the stewardess who accomplishes
The poem is primarily about the artificial trappings, both mental
and physical, that tend to separate man from his natural self. Approximately
three-fifths of the way through the narrative, the stewardess begins
to remove her uniform. Dickey skillfully prefigures and postpones the girl's
remembering that "she still has time to die / Beyond explanation." A hint of this
ritual disrobing comes earlier with
The emphasis on sexuality in "Falling" and
many of Dickey's other poems reiterates
his theme that headlong procreative and pleasurable urges of sex are the motion of life and of art. The story of the young lovers
in "May Day Sermon to the Women of Gilmer County, Georgia,
by a Woman Preacher Leaving the Baptist Church" still lives because
it is inseparable from the burgeoning spring
of Gilmer County. Every year the lovers are resurrected, their sexuality
implied again in sermons to new young lovers. Ostensibly the woman preacher
speaks on May Day against the sexual sins of the young, but the poet acts
through her to show the vital eroticism that underlies much of backwoods religious ecstasy. This major theme of the poem is substantiated
by the woman preacher's ambiguous stance as she supposedly levels the
lightning of the Word at these amorous young people. Her earnestness
in the sermon, the purity of her personal past, and her motives for "leaving
the Baptist Church" all come under suspicion. Even as she claims to aid in
stifling the springtime mating urges of the local virgins, she never actually
condemns the girls, except through her vivid projections of an outraged father,
whose sadistic sexual morality is itself in question. In her sermon's
chief illustration, she displays an intriguingly specific knowledge of the sexually
delinquent girl's punishment:
Her images and her long, incantatory lines supply emotional stimulation
for the reader, and he is likely to accept her telling of this springtime
tale as just that--an exemplum fervently recounted. But the ambivalence of
the poem
supplies intellectual stimulation, also. The preacher is a
woman, one who is leaving the Baptist church, and
she has seemed utterly involved in the doings of the young bloods as well
as the judgings of the old heads. She is decidedly perfervid, but by the end
of the poem her desire is suspect. She appears ambiguously pleased
that her annual sermon coincides with the spring-renewed memories of the
motorcycle-fleeing pair of young lovers. She may be melancholy at her
sermon's close, not for their supposed deaths, but for her own real or imagined
participation in their story. The poem-sermon is built and spent in a manner
remarkably like that of sexual passion, and the preacher is the
author of it.
While it preaches no sermon, "The Sheep child"
attains very nearly the power of mythic utterance.
The sheep child itself speaks at the end of the poem, and it shows its magnified view of
the truth of two worlds (recalling mad Pip of Moby-Dick, but without Pip's seeming
incoherence):
The Eye-Beaters, Blood, Victory, Madness,
Buckhead and Mercy (1970)
suggests by its title that Dickey's work is less a body composed of volumes
than of poems. This is not to say that the individual books are carelessly
organized; the truth is quite the opposite. Rather it is only to observe that
the final judgment of James Dickey will be in terms of his great single efforts
multiplied over and over: "The Sheep Child," "May Day
Sermon," "Falling," "Encounter in the Cage Country," "The Firebombing," "Drinking from a Helmet," "Power and Light," "The Performance," "The
Lifeguard," "The Heaven of Animals," The Zodiac, "For the Last Wolverine," "Madness," "Adultery," "The Owl King," "Cherrylog Road," "Kudzu,"
"The Shark's Parlor," "Pursuit from Under," "To His Children in Darkness," and on.
In the title poem, "The Eye-Beaters," Dickey gives
the reader a compendium of many of his ideas about
aesthetics and religion; to convey these ideas he has rendered
three major physical actions in the poem: eye-beating by blind children, cave-painting,
and hunting. The poem ends with the persona, enlightened by his experience from
(and to) the depths of his racial memory, going out
into the modern world to "hunt":
Dickey's own marginal gloss introduces the dramatic situation: "A man visits a Home for children in Indiana, some of whom have gone
blind there." The man asks the therapists why the children's arms
are bound and why their faces are bruised. When the therapist explains
that the children's blows to their own eyes produce an illusion of light--of
sight--the visitor is so pained by the thought that he must invent a "deeper"
reason, a deeper vision that the children might be attaining
through such pain and "perversity." He feels that the commitment of the children
to their "vision" is absolute: "Ah, Stranger, you do not visit this place,
/ You live or die in it." Their vision--as the visitor imagines it--takes
the form of a prehistoric cave-artist, who tries by sympathetic magic
to make a good hunt for the people. He is godlike and bestial all at once;
he is incipient Man, close to his animalistic source, and he is the order-giving
Artist. The visitor's fantasy is challenged by his own Reason: "Why painting and Hunting? Why animals showing how God / Is subject to
the pictures in the cave ...?" And the mind of invention
must answer that his fiction is self-serving; it saves from insanity the
sensitive and compassionate mind. Despite Reason's charge of escapism, the visitor,
who now has become the Artist figure, goes on with his invention; for the
fiction has blurred reality and imagination together, and, although the
poetic invention grows more insistent and compelling, the feeling grows that
the poet's--Dickey's--real
position is ambiguous. Through his sympathy for the children, he constructs
a palliative fantasy which removes him somewhat from the true plight of those
same children for whom he feels such painful compassion. The visitor persists
in his fiction, "the race hangs on meat and illusion hangs on nothing / But
a magical art," and the mind of Reason seems almost to be won
over as the poem nears its conclusion: "Hold on to your
fantasy; it is all that can save / A man with good eyes in this place."
Reason appears to have come to some compassion, and the visitor insists: "The
wall glimmers that God and man / Never forgot. I have put history out. An innocent
eye, it is closed / Off, outside in the sun. Wind moans like an artist...."
As Dickey progressed through Helmets
and Buckdancer's Choice to Poems 1957-1967,
he moved more into the tradition of the Southern storyteller, so that the point
of view of the narrator became almost as interesting in itself as the putative
subject matter of the work. Dickey's altered narrative voice is especially evident
in such works as "The Firebombing," "The Fiend," "The Sheep Child," "May Day Sermon," and "Falling."
As he began to devote his energies to fiction--Deliverance--and the movies, another
important shift seriously affected The Eye-Beaters,
Blood, Victory, Madness, Buckhead and Mercy, The Zodiac, and even the coffee-table offerings of Jericho (1974) and God's
Images (1977). The narrator
broke his way into full view as the manipulator of voices within poems,
somewhat after the manner of Coleridge in "The Rime of the Ancient
Mariner," or Vonnegut with Kilgore Trout, or Brecht with his purposeful breaches of
dramatic verisimilitude.
This shift in Dickey's self-conscious poetic voice may correlate to
his allegation that he became a poet when he "learned the creative possibilities
of the lie," that is, the taking on of masks and voices not his own in real
life. It may also be tied, at least in part, to Dickey's story that his early poems
emerged from precognitive rhythms to which he afterwards fastened words, and
then to his later emphasis on narrative as the basis for his most
satisfying writing. In "The Poet Turns on Himself" (1966),
Dickey wrote, "now and then I began to hear lines of verse,
lines without words to them, that had what was to me a very compelling sound:
an unusual sound of urgency and passion, of grave conviction, or inevitability,
of the same kind of drive and excitement that one hears in a good passage
of slow jazz." By the time Self-Interviews appeared in 1970, Dickey
was declaring how important narrative was to him: "I liked narrative,
I liked something that moved from an event or an action through something
else, and resolved into something else, so that there was a constant sense
of change in the poem ...."
During the period 1974-1977, Dickey published three books which many
people considered disappointments, but to confront these books' subject matter,
their themes, and their issuance is to perceive important developments in
Dickey's career. The first volume, Jericho: The South
Beheld, is a heavy,
expensive coffee-table book illustrated with color prints of paintings by
Hubert Shuptrine and aimed at the Christmas slick-book trade of 1974. The
second is The Zodiac, a sixty-two-page
work printed with lots of open space on its
distinctively short but wide pages. The third book, the coffee-table offering
for the 1977 season, although not nearly so grandiose in its execution as Jericho, but
considerably more pretentious in its title, God's Images, and its intent to retell
some of the biblical stories, offers Dickey's text alongside black and white
etchings by Marvin Hayes.
At the time of these works' publication,Dickey had not had a volume
of poetry
published in four years, hiatus partly attributable to his occupation with
the fabulous success of Deliverance
as a novel and a movie. But perhaps
the most striking effect of these three books in quick succession is that
they served to consolidate at the half-century of his life Dickey's major
cultural influences: Southern America, Western Europe, and the Judeo-Christian tradition.
Jericho: The South Beheld explores
the rich prose language and sensual impressions
of the American South, which Dickey has publicly championed, especially
during and after the election of Jimmy Carter to the presidency. The Zodiac, as
Dickey says, is a poem "based on another of the same title ... [which] was written
by Hendrik Marsman, who was killed by a torpedo in the North Atlantic in 1940....
Its twelve sections are the story of a drunken and perhaps dying Dutch poet
who returns to his home in Amsterdam after years of travel and tries desperately
to relate himself, by means of stars, to the universe." The work is studded
with references to Western European culture, with the narrator associatively
exploring its philosophical and artistic influences. (When he spends several
lines on Pythagoras, whose speculations about the Ideal led him into mathematical
and musical
demonstrations, at least for a moment, Dickey actually transforms the Grecian
lyre into a guitar.) The third book, God's Images, is Dickey's prose-poem
gesture toward the influence of the Bible on him, his Southernness made
specifically religious. But the religious images are
intended not to be entirely orthodox. For, as Dickey indicates in the foreword,
the images are men's and are as subject to men's alterations as to God's:
"The Bible is the greatest treasure-house of powerful, disturbing,
life-enhancing images in the whole of humanity's long history. They are the
images of what generations of men have taken to be those projected on the
human race by God Himself, or God as He resides in the souls of men. To
an artist such as Marvin Hayes, or to a poet, such as I hold myself to be, these
images have unfolded in us by means of the arts we practice. These are our images of God's Images."
Jericho and God's Images are similar. They both came out of Oxmoor
House in Birmingham, Alabama,
the publisher of the magazines Southern Living
and Progressive Farmer. Both were
designed
as gift and display books. Both were conceived as a combination of graphic
arts and poetical-prose text. Both have a built-in sentimental appeal. But
there are significant differences. Some of these are in Dickey's use of the
narrators of his lines, and it is on this point that the two fancy books are
related to The Zodiac, as well as
to each other. (There may even be some correspondence
between the firmness of Dickey's convictions about, and his commitment to,
the major subjects of each book and the relative single-mindedness of each
narrator.)
Jericho, the book of Dickey's place, is devised
as a journey from city to city throughout the old and the new South by one
speaker serving as a tour guide of the soul. He is a man of cosmic proportions,
an epic consciousness reminiscent of Walt Whitman. Nonetheless, for all its
variety and multiplicity, the voice intends to be single.
The Zodiac's omniscient voice
occasionally intrudes upon the narration
to emphasize that this thing is a fiction, that the story is being told, although frequently the reader moves into the mind of the Dutch poet
himself, as if he were telling the
story. The main difference between this narration and that of Jericho is in
its considerable fragmentation--first, in the presence of two minds (the omniscient
narrator and the Dutch poet), and second, in the diffusion and brokenness of the poet-protagonist,
who admits to having DTs and imaginative flights, both of which ("Imagination
and dissipation both fire at me / Point-blank") make the apprehension of his
clearest single self extremely difficult for most of the duration of the poem.
In God's Images, the narrator's
plan is to take on the voices of various individuals
in scenes and stories from the Old and New Testaments. There is no one voice;
the question is whether or not there is a single vision. By way of
contrast, Jericho begins with the poet's
request of the reader: "I ask you
to become all-seeing and invisible, in the special, secret manner in which
only you yourself--since you were a child--know how to do, and to focus at
many places in the South.... With our sea-bird's eyes now become those of
a land-bird, let us indeed swoop. But let us also flicker, so that
we can pick out small and penetrating beholdings, and move them over the page."
And so with his version of a magic-carpet ride, Dickey enlists
the reader's sympathy and vision to join him in a swooping, spiraling,
and flickering tour of the South, a place of mythic import
and sensual impact, a place to supply vision and the language
to recreate it. The book ends with an epilogue: "We have finished our ghostly
flickering over Jericho, our zigzagging, our air-standing and webbing through
images. We have given up the ghost and the butterfly, and now
turn to each other, down out of immortality onto the Promised, the re-Promised
Land. Come down, reader, and be whole here. Here." The promise of Jericho,
the book and the place--a poetic, demiurgic promise--is to be whole, for the vision
of the percipient soarer to remedy the world's confusion and to unify its
fragmented people.
The Zodiac begins with a narrator
palpably more in control of things than
the main character he is describing: "The man I'm telling you about brought
himself back alive / A couple of years ago. / He's here, / Making no trouble
...." At one point, the Dutch protagonist moans in self-pity: "No flower could
get up these steps, / It'd wither at the hollowness / Of these foot-stomping
/ failed creative-man's boards / There's nothing to bring love
or death
/ Or creative boredom through the walls." But by the end, the voices of the
narrator and the drunken poet have merged by finding some partially satisfying answer
(one might argue that the clearer-headed omniscient narrator is actually the
recovered protagonist, Marsman's version of Ishmael, "escaped alone to tell
thee"):
At the conclusions of Jericho and The Zodiac one can mark the unifying impulses,
but God's Images is less certain.
In fact, the book's final word makes no explicit
affirmation; rather, it is simply the question "Why?" From the Old Testament,God's Images
depicts twenty-nine scenes or stories. Of these, sixteen are told as though
from an omniscient perspective. In one of the scenes where the reader might
expect the athletic and sometimes sanguinary Dickey to be intensely involved,
he chooses to report in third person: "His enemies are sprawled in heaps around
him. Heel in eye, elbow in dead, open mouth .... He looks at the jawbone, half-dead with thirst
and at a word from Heaven, the mouth-part that once cropped grass fills with
cool water. He drinks deep, tasting bone. Deep." Perhaps, though, the sated
warrior Samson is a recollection for Dickey of the distant "aesthetic" warrior
in "The Firebombing," or of
John Hersey's The War Lover (1959),
which Dickey has admired. Whereas only a dozen or so
of the Old Testament stories are told from the viewpoints of their
subjects, almost three-fourths from the New Testament have first-person narrators,
as though the poet might more easily identify with Christian-era events. One
of the most curious is called "Jesus Laughing": "To any laugh
the stones of anywhere respond .... men speak
of me as a man of pain and sorrow, but they have not reached the other side
of God,
and while I was here among you, the pain and terror were balanced ... by a
great grin into nothingness, which justified everything; by a strong measure
of sly Holy Fun. Laughter." Despite, however, this hint of Dickey's possibly
being ironic in his portrayal of God's images, the unhappy impact of
the book is that it takes itself too seriously, and its solemnity is not redeemed
by the epic movement of Jericho
or by the fitful progression of the narrator-poet's mind in The Zodiac.
Dickey's work ranges from poems which are introspective and pressurized
to those which seem unable to keep their boundaries, displaying energy in
a kind of explosion of the poetic personality. He affects no generalized modern
voice, no angst-ridden vagueness, until perhaps The
Zodiac, and it must be remembered
that here he essentially rewrote a modernist northern European poem.
And yet, with its subject of a bedraggled poet struggling to raise himself to new
creations, the poem seems to suit perfectly Dickey's career in the late 1970s,
not so much taking a new turn as trying to sustain a deliberate new beginning,
willfully to exercise the sophisticated intelligence of James Dickey in his
excursions into imitations and translations of non-English poets, when in fact
those works which are most clearly identified as his are usually mouthed through
speakers who are rather decidedly Southern in their language rhythms, their
literary modes, and in their ways of perceiving. There is solid affirmation
and impatience with self-pity in Dickey. There is sadness at what is truly
sad and resistance against the cleverly poised paradoxes which came to obsess
the poetry
of modernism. Dickey has always resisted "schools."
In the late 1970s he began to speak of having forged the tool of his
craft, of having learned to use his wings that would allow him to fly to Parnassus.
Uneasily, the question arises as to whether or not, when a poet actually begins
to feel that surety of being trained, of being honed, it may be a sign of
being done, rather than of being ready to do more.
The 1979 book The Strength of Fields
is half imitations or rewrites
("Head-Deep in Strange Sounds")
and only half poems that Dickey himself composed from scratch. Some of these
are ten years old. "Root Light, or the Lawyer's Daughter" appeared
in the New Yorker (1969) in plenty
of time to
have been included in the 1970 Eye-Beaters ,
and only two of thirteen poems not from the rewritten "unEnglish"
were published after 1973.
Aside from the nagging discomfort over Dickey's relatively low output
of poems
in the new decade, a more serious impression persists: too much self-satisfaction,
too little metaphysical struggle. The poems lack fear, as if there is little
possibility of flying loose. As one might say of an operatic tenor, the purity
and clarity are good, but if no risk is augured in the act, no matter how
fine and well-paced, no matter how decorous, it is as though all were ordinary.
There is something eminently safe about this book, and, at least in the past,
Dickey has said repeatedly that the crucial word is "Dare.Dare." These poems
do not dare enough. They are beautiful in many
ways; they are accomplished in many ways; they are the things that one often
says when one speaks of sunsets. The Strength of Fields might be considered
auspicious or distressing, depending on one's view of James Dickey's potential
for further distinguished work as a poet. On the one hand, the poems have a calm
about them which confirms the "honed instrument" Dickey now possesses, but
on the other, hand, they have a sort of righteousness without risk. The pressure
is missing: whereas Walt Whitman can say, believing in the divine potentiality
of men, "I stop somewhere waiting for you," in "For the Running of
the New York City Marathon," Dickey
addresses a multitude of thousands as though all have fulfilled their trendy
physical-fitness mystique: "All winning, one after one."
The Strength of Fields is
a Dickey sampler, at least in terms of theme. In "Root Light,
or the Lawyer's Daughter"
the reader has the Dickey of sexual awareness, of fertility attached and
vivified by qualities of the imagination, to relate the lawyer's daughter,
who works at J. C. Penney's, to some perfection of womanhood that the eight-year-old
boy carries with him into adulthood. When the girl dives naked off the Talmadge
Bridge into the river and the startled view of the boy underwater, it is a
persuasive commingling of nature--the trees, the roots, the light from above, and the reddish tinting
of the water by the excrescences of the plants--all in a river which streams
with mystical import but which also very practically functions to keep Georgia
and Florida separated. Other poems deal with wartime experiences.
In The Eye-Beaters, Dickey included
a poem
about "Looking for the Buckhead Boys" in which persists something
of the buddy-buddy quality which underlies but is never emphasized in "The Shark's Parlor." This Buckhead-Boy
feeling with its incumbent prosiness and slack colloquialism is found in "Reunioning
Dialogue": two pilots, years later, who have come to share memories and to
stretch that story-telling until a boisterous but flat revelation at the end
tries to evoke gales of laughter from drinking buddies, back-slaps, and bar-pounding.
The poem
is not joyless, but it is loose; it is diffuse, not so much rhetorically as emotionally.
The chaotic clamor of things not holding, of things breaking down, is endemic
to a poem
like The Zodiac, whereas in this poem
it is as though the center never was
really quite enough. It is Archie Bunker exuberantly looking forward to a
reunion with his army pals and then, when it happens, finding that they do
not really have anything to say to one another. There is a joke, a guffaw,
at the end of "Reunioning Dialogue,"
but it is not enough to redeem, not enough to matter; and if Dickey ever tells
the reader anything, it is that poems speak of what matters.
Dialogue is a common device in Dickey's works. Sometimes
he openly experiments with it, as in "The Eye-Beaters," with
an unnamed narrator slipping even into the marginalia,
after the manner of Coleridge in "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner." In one critical review, Dickey counterpoints
two ambivalent voices to explore what he sees as two sides of the sensibility
of Randall Jarrell. In the 1970 Phi Beta Kappa poem, "Exchanges," Dickey
engages Joseph Trumbull Stickney in a "living-dead dialogue,"
passing back and forth from the nineteenth century to the twentieth, thus
examining American culture as, in The Zodiac,
he explores Western European culture.
In Self-Interviews Dickey
says, "the official response is the very death of poetry.
What poetry
has to have is the unofficial response: the response
which is crazy, outlandish, cannot be justified by any conceivable public
accord." Of course, "The Strength of Fields" was written for
the occasion of President Jimmy Carter's 1977
Inauguration, and it is possessed by the very sane and inoffensive sentimentality
of most official laureate poems: accessibility without shock. It begins forcefully, when
something of the energy of the small town is embodied in the moth-flickers
around various lights, creating a sense that spirits of the night and of the land
are melding with the spirits of men, but the poem remains only a glow-place of comfortable emotion,
lacking the peculiarly Dickeyesque passion, the internal "monster" described
in a 1920 letter by Rilke: "All that the rest forget in order to make their
life possible, we are always bent on discovering, on magnifying even; it is
we who are the real awakeners of our monsters, to which we are not hostile enough
to become their conquerors; for in a certain sense we are at one with them;
it is they, the monsters, that hold the surplus strength which is indispensable
to those that must surpass themselves."
The Strength of Fields is
clearly "the collected poems" of the past ten years, a time in
which Dickey has written The Zodiac ,
the children's poem Tucky the Hunter
(1978), Jericho, and God's Images, among which only The Zodiac might have severely taxed the extraordinary
gifts of James Dickey. The Strength of Fields
turns toward a more constrained,
quieter, contemplative mode, which suggests that Dickey is gathering his forces,
that this is an intermezzo of deadly serious intent. Dedicated "To
Deborah, in the new life," this book
is no mere lapse: it is a pulling-together of the best poems from the weakest
time of Dickey's poetic career. Some are as good as much of his prior work:
probably none attains to his best. But what an Ovidian-Homeric-Herculean accomplishment
that would be! It is no wonder that Dickey could write in Sorties, "a man cannot pay so much
attention to himself as I do without living in Hell all the time." We would
continue to devour the man who has given so much; we would ask of him more
than we ask of ourselves.
It may be the sea-moving moon
Is swayed upon the waves by what I do.
...................................
I lie down,
Beginning to sleep, sustained
By a huge, ruined stone in the sky
As it draws the lost tide-water flat ...
Men and women, universally, are imprisoned, whether actually, as in the case
of Airman Donald Armstrong, captured by
the Japanese in "The Performance,"
who must therefore set himself a redeeming task (his gymnastics tricks),
which will require the utmost in physical concentration and expertise for
a moment, however brief; or, as in "Near Darien," imprisoned
simply in the mortal conditions of space and time,
the strict limitations of flesh and senses, perhaps to escape in part through
transcendent acts of the mind, often represented in natural terms--flight,
light, song. As the poem "Into the Stone" implies by its title, the psychical
movement inward, the seeking of the self and communion with others by going
into the soul as it is caught in paradoxical ecstasy, is crucial to the mode
of Dickey's first collection: The dead have their chance in my body.
The stars are drawn into their myths.
I bear nothing but moonlight upon me.
I am known; I know my love.
Drowning with Others (1962)
is more openly social than Into the Stone.
The speaker of "The Lifeguard" expresses painful
concern over other people's opinions of him: his futile efforts are registered
in the disappointed faces of expectant children who watch him come up repeatedly
without their companion. The energy of the poem gathers from the public adoration
of lifeguards to a sudden call for the figurehead to perform, and then for
him to consider what to do with himself now that he has failed. Paradoxically,
the lifeguard's urge to affirm his identity is outward, toward his wards,
unlike the heroic self-affirmation achieved in the extreme circumstances of
Donald Armstrong, who faces a momentarily puzzled Japanese headsman.
Through the trees, with the moon underfoot,
More soft than I can, I call.
I hear the king of the owls sing
Where he moves with my son in the gloom.
In fact, the voice of any one speaker is commonly insufficient
to Dickey's aesthetic needs: he is expansive in impulse, Faustian in wanting
to know everything possible, even to speaking in three tongues. Fifteen years
after "The Owl King," in "The Eye-Beaters,"
his voices remonstrate,
comment, and turn himself back upon himself: the reader is told, "His Reason argues with his invention." In The Zodiac, the
third-person omniscient
narrator frequently merges or alternates with the voice of the drunken poet
whose sometimes chaotic but ultimately resolved state of mind is itself the
subject of the poem.
From a child's tall book, I knew this place
The child must believe, with the king:
Where, doubtless, now, lay lovers
Restrained by a cloud, and the moon
Into force coming justly, above.
In a movement you cannot imagine
Of love, the gulls fall, mating.
Dickey seeks the
historical South in "Hunting Civil War Relics at Nimblewill
Creek," but the speaker is less intimately
fused with the objects of his search, the "other" subjectivity he pursues,
than in "Dover: Believing in Kings,"
since the Civil War relics are so many, disparate, and impersonal (spotted
by a mechanical, electronic metal-detector rather than
the natural senses). The connection he feels with the participants in that war is faint and generalized, only tenuously like the spiritual
trauma seen in the later "Drinking from a Helmet." Perhaps
the difference lies mainly in the fact that a relic
hunter with a metal detector is too purposely seeking meaningful connections
to the past: imagination wants letting-go as well as readiness. And so the
speaker of the poem is able to speculate even in the negative as to what meaning
shall be put at the end: kneeling Like a man who renounces war,
Or one who shall lift up the past,
Not breathing "Father,"
At Nimblewill,
But saying, "Fathers! Fathers!"
In any
case, it is clear that the new-found historical explicitness of Dickey's poetry
in Drowning with Others goes hand-in-hand
with a growing objectivity about his family
themes and images.
From above, we watch over them like gods,
Our chins on our hands,
Our great eyes staring, our throats dry
And aching to cry down on their heads
Some curse or blessing ....
But unlike the speaker of
the later poem "The Firebombing"
(1964), who decries his own "detachment, / The honored aesthetic evil,"
the "we" of "The Beholders"
act to the end with "the power to speak / With deadly intent of love."
Their aesthetic play with the stuff of their experience, then, is less culpable
than that perpetrated by an unloving, immoral imagination, even
though every artist (or perceiver) must inevitably falsify whatever subject
he acts upon. However serious Dickey is, though, about aesthetic principles
(and his excellent essays in The Suspect in Poetry [1964], Babel to Byzantium
[1968], Self-Interviews, Sorties[1971],
and elsewhere attest to his insight), he knows that "artsiness" is never adequate
to the forces of experience.
It is this detachment,
The honored aesthetic evil,
........................
That must be shed in bars, or by whatever
Means ....
Dickey's various
images fuse the sensitivity and callousness inherent in his experience. He
draws upon simple personification so that inanimate objects are caught up
in the introspection that has traumatized the narrator: "the engines ... ponder
their sound"; "Japan / Dilates ... like a thought"; "the lawn mower rests
on its laurels"; "My hat should crawl on my head/In streetcars, thinking of
it,/The fat on my body should pale." In one passage ("My exhaled face in the
mirror / Of bars, dilates in a cloud like Japan"), the ubiquity of his meditation
is signaled by the narrator's singular form "mirror
/ Of bars."
Her last superhuman act the last slow careful passing of her hands
All over her unharmed body desired by every sleeper in his dream ....
She
is no longer a maiden stewardess, but a woman sacrifice, a goddess come to
bring fertility to the soil.
the arms of her jacket slipping
Air up her sleeves to go all over her? What final things can be said
Of one who starts out sheerly in her body in the high middle of night
Air ...?
And the poem is an attempt
to suggest "what final things can be said." This very real stewardess, whose
thoughts are filled with uniforms, labels, and TV, has "her eyes opened wide"
as the world diminishes to one state, and finally to "a little sight left
in the corner / Of one eye." And the reader stands with the astonished farmers
to see trim technology "driven well into the image
of her body / The furrows for miles around flowing in upon her." The poem
is not exactly a modern morality play; but civilization's airplane,
the airline's female vending machine of pleasantries, and the sudden,
irrational ejection into the world of nature, gravity, stars, and fields--these
do make a pattern of the worth, not the waste, of natural man. From Dickey's
point of view, the stewardess transcends the mundane and finds a new sense
of life in her mortal descent.
Listen: often a girl in the country,
Mostly sweating mostly in spring, deep enough in the holy Bible
Belt, will feel her hair rise up arms rise, and this not any wish
Of hers, and clothes like lint shredding off her abominations
In the sight of the Lord; will hear the Book speak like a father
Gone mad ....
With the incantatory lines he has established early in
the poem,
Dickey heightens emotions until the girl's retributive slaying of her father prevents
simple moralizing. The passions' dam has broken, as it does
each year when this story is told, and warm floods sweep aside the fundamentalist morality;
it is clear that the violence comes simply because of violent attempts to
stop the fertile world from being itself each spring. The preacher has
no choice but to stand somewhat dazed by her own sermon, perhaps unwittingly
reconciled to the same passionate forces she has tried to oppose.
I saw for a blazing moment
The great grassy world from both sides,
Man and beast in the round of their need,
And the hill wind stirred in my wool,
My hoof and my hand clasped each other,
I ate my one meal
Of milk, and died
Staring. From dark grass I came straight
To my father's house, whose dust
Whirls up in the halls for no reason
When no one comes piling deep in a hellish mild corner,
And, through my immortal waters,
I met the sun's grains eye
To eye, and they fail at my closet of glass.
Dead, I am most surely living
In the minds of farm boys ....
At the most elementary level, this poem deals with
the frustration of restraining the natural impulses to sex, and the fantasies
that make such restraint possible. These fantasies have their Freudian revenge, for
a time: "Dreaming of me, / They groan they wait they
suffer / Themselves, they marry, they raise their kind."
So the farm boys' needs--precipitous in their
motion toward sexual fulfillment ("wild to couple / With anything")--are tempered
"by legends," the replacement of abstract morality with concrete
narrative "truth." Even the sheep child itself is immortalized--"Pickled in
alcohol"--in a museum, in "my immortal waters."
The classical and Christian mythology associated with this legend
are overwhelming, with the god-lover coming to serve his procreative
blessings upon some mortal female. Perhaps the truth of the classical myths
and of this new, grotesque myth is that the visitation of gods upon women and
of men upon sheep is both demeaning to them and gracious of them, evidence
both of the trivial in the highest and of the divine in the lowest. In Self-Interviews,
Dickey recalls, "I intended no blasphemy or obscenity by this a poem
at all. I tried to the best of my ability to write a poem about the universal
need for contact between living creatures that runs through all of sentient nature
and recognizes no boundaries of species or anything else." It is also extremely
important to remember that, although the figure of the sheep child is monstrous,
it does demonstrate the fusion of man and nature and that, with "eyes
/ Far more than human," the sheep child has eternal, unyielding vision.
Yeats, had he not aspired to being a golden bird in Byzantium, might have appreciated
being the perfectly preserved sheep child in an Atlanta museum, watching and
saying the truth, staring down the sun.
The tribal children lie
On their rocks in their animal skins seeing in spurts of eye-beating
Dream, the deer, still wet with creation, open its image to the heart's
Blood, as I step forward, as I move through the beast-paint of the stone,
Taken over, submitting, brain-weeping. Light me a torch with what we have preserved
Of lightning. Cloud bellows in my hand. Good man hunter artist father
Be with me. My prey is rock-trembling, calling. Beast, get in
My way. Your body opens onto the plain. Deer, take me into your life-
lined form. I merge, I pass beyond in secret in perversity and the sheer
Despair of invention my double-clear bifocals off my reason gone
Like eyes. Therapist, farewell at the living end. Give me my spear.
To infuse with human
consciousness a nonhuman poetic image is an act of fantasy; it may create
a monster, a Sheep Child. To desire whatever might be desirable in a wild animal
is wistfulness and sentimentality; it is to run foolishly naked after a deer
down Springer Mountain. To rely on an encyclopedia of archetypal images is
to produce a study exercise for a freshman poetry class. But to hunt--or to render
hunting poetically--is to confront nature nearly on its own terms. Human beings
cannot really enter into the world of instinct that Dickey admires so much,
and he knows it: "I don't believe it's possible to know how the albatross
or the homing pigeon navigates. I believe that is absolutely beyond comprehension"
(Self-Interviews). But to hunt is
to be able, within some limits of natural animals'
instincts, to impose human ritual, human order, upon the nonhuman animate
world. It is in this not-fully-human-controlled/not-purely-instinctual quality
that hunting is life and is art. It is the recognition of this quality that "The Eye-Beaters" offers.
So long as the hand can hold its island
Of blazing paper, and bleed for its images:
Make what it can of what is:
So long as the spirit hurls on space
The star-beasts of intellect and madness.
Writings by the Author
Books
Into the Stone and other Poems, in Poets of Today VII, ed. John Hall Wheelock (New York: Scribners, 1960).
Drowning with Others (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1962).
Helmets (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1964; London: Longmans, 1964).
The Suspect in Poetry (Madison, Minn.: Sixties Press, 1964).
Two Poems of the Air (Portland, Oreg.: Centicore Press, 1964).
Buckdancer's Choice (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1965).
Poems 1957-1967 (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1967; London; Rapp & Carroll, 1967).
Spinning the Crystal Ball (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1967).
Babel to Byzantium: Poets & Poetry Now (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1968).
Metaphor as Pure Adventure (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1968).
Deliverance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970; London: Hamish Hamilton, 1970).
The Eye-Beaters, Blood, Victory, Madness, Buck head and Mercy (Garden City: Doubleday, 1970; London: Hamish Hamilton, 1971).
Self-Interviews, recorded and edited by Barbara and James Reiss (Garden City: Doubleday, 1970).
Exchanges (Bloomfield Hills, Mich.: Bruccoli Clark, 1971).
Sorties (Garden City: Doubleday, 1971).
Jericho: The South Beheld, text by Dickey, illustrations by Hubert Shuptrine (Birmingham, Ala.: Oxmoor House, 1974).
The Zodiac (limited edition, Bloomfield Hills, Mich. & Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli Clark, 1976; trade edition, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday,
1976).
The Strength of Fields[single poem] (Bloomfield Hills, Mich. & Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli Clark, 1977).
God's Images, text by Dickey, etchings by Marvin Hayes (Birmingham, Ala.: Oxmoor House, 1977).
The Enemy from Eden(Northridge, Cal.: Lord John Press, 1978).
Tucky the Hunter, text by Dickey, illustrations by Marie Angel (New York: Crown, 1978; London: Macmillan, 1979).
Veteran Birth: The Gadfly Poems 1947-1949(Winston-Salem, N.C.: Palaemon Press, 1978).
In Pursuit of the Grey Soul (Columbia, S.C. & Bloomfield Hills, Mich.: Bruccoli Clark, 1978).
Head-Deep in Strange Sounds (Winston-Salem, N.C.: Palaemon Press, 1979).
The Water-Bug's Mittens: Ezra Pound: What We Can Use(Moscow: University of Idaho, 1979; Bloomfield Hills Mich. & Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli
Clark, 1980).
The Strength of Fields [collection] (Garden City: Doubleday, 1979).
Scion(Deerfield, Mass. & Dublin, Ireland: Deerfield Press/Gallery Press, 1980).
Falling, May Day Sermon, and Other Poems(Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1981).
The Starry Place Between the Antlers: Why I Live in South Carolina(Bloomfield Hills, Mich. & Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli Clark, 1981).
Deliverance[screenplay] (Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982).
Puella(Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1982).
Varmland(Winston-Salem, N.C.: Palaemon Press, 1982).
The Central Motion: Poems, 1968-1979(Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1983).
Intervisions, poems by Dickey and photographs by Sharon Anglin Kuhne (Penland, N.C.: Visualalternatives, 1983).
False Youth: Four Seasons(Dallas: Pressworks, 1983).
Night Hurdling: Poems, Essays, Conversations, Commencements, and Afterwords(Bloomfield Hills, Mich. & Columbia, S.C.: Bruccoli Clark,
1983).
Bronwen, the Traw, and the Shape-Shifter, text by Dickey, illustrations by Richard Jesse Watson (San Diego, New York & London: Bruccoli
Clark/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986).
Alnilam(Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1987).
Wayfarer: A Voice from the Southern Mountains, text by Dicket, photographs by William A. Baker (Birmingham, Ala.: Oxmoor House, 1988).
The Eagle's Mile(Middletown, Conn.: Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press: University Press of New England, 1990).
Southern Light, photographs by James Valentine (Birmingham, Ala.: Oxmoor House, 1991).
The Whole Motion: Collected Poems, 1945-1992(MIddletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1992).
To the White Sea(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).
Striking in: the Early Notebooks of James Dickey, edited by Gordon Van Ness (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1996).
Other
Sewanee Review Fellowship, 1954-1955; Union League Civic and Arts Foundation Prize (Poetry magazine), 1958; Longview Foundation, 1959;
Vachel Lindsay Prize, 1959; Guggenheim Fellowship, 1961; National Book Award for Buckdancer's Choice, 1966; Melville Cane Award (Poetry
Society of America) for Buckdancer's Choice, 1966; National Institute of Arts and Letters Award, 1966; Consultant in Poetry in English for the
Library of Congress, 1966-1968; Prix Medicis, 1971; New York Quarterly Poetry Day Award, 1977.
A Poetry Experience on Film / Lord Let Me Die / But Not Die Out / James Dickey: Poet, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1970.
Deliverance, Warner Brothers, 1972.
Call of the Wild, Charles Fries, 1976.
Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Stolen Apples, includes twelve poems adapted by Dickey (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971).
Thomas Boyd, Through Wheat, afterword by Dickey (Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).
Richard Eberhart, Of Poetry and Poets, foreword by Dickey (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979).
"The Energized Man," in Billy Goat 2 (Clemson, S.C.: Billy Goat Press, 1979), pp. 1-3.
Samuel Clemens, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, introduction by Dickey (New York: New American Library,
1979).
From the Green Horseshoe: Poems by James Dickey's Students, edited by Dickey (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1987).
"Two Days in September," Atlantic, 225 (February 1970): 78-108.
"Blowjob on a Rattlesnake," Esquire, 82 (October 1974): 177-178, 368.
"Small Visions from a Timeless Place," Playboy, 21 (October 1974): 152-154, 220-221.
"Cahill Is Blind," Esquire, 85 (February 1976): 67-69, 139-144.
"A Note on the Poetry of John Logan," Sewanee Review, 70 (Spring 1962): 257-260.
"Dialogues with Themselves," New York Times Book Review, 28 April 1963, p. 50.
"An Old Family Custom," New York Times Book Review, 6 June 1965, pp. 1, 16.
"The Triumph of Apollo 7," Life, 69 (1 November 1968): 26.
"James Dickey Tells About Deliverance," Literary Guild Magazine (April 1970): 6-7.
"Process of Writing a Novel," Writer, 83 (June 1970): 12-13.
"Poet Tries to Make a Kind of Order," Mademoiselle, 76 (September 1970): 142-143, 209-210, 212.
"Reading," Mademoiselle, 79 (January 1973): 133-134.
"Look into Your Future: Life Style," Today's Health, 51 (April 1973): 54-55, 65 (truncated after p. 65).
"Delights of the Edge," Mademoiselle, 80 (June 1974): 118-119.
"Selling His Soul to the Devil by Day and Buying It Back by Night," TV Guide (14 July 1979): 18-20.
"The Geek of Poetry," review of Letters of Vachel Lindsay, New York Times Book Review, 23 December 1979, pp. 9, 17-18.
Major collections of manuscripts are found in the Washington University Library, St. Louis; and the Library of Congress.
Further Readings About the Author
"An Interview with James Dickey," Eclipse, 5 (1965-1966): 5-20.
"James Dickey on Poetry and Teaching," Publishers
Weekly, 189 (28 March 1966): 34.
"A Conversation with James Dickey," Shenandoah, 18 (Autumn 1966): 3-28.
Nan Robertson, "New National Poetry Consultant Can Also Talk
a Non Stop Prose," New York Times, 10 September
1966, sec. I, p. 11.
"P.P.A. Authors' Press Conference," Publishers
Weekly, 197 (23 March 1970): 27-29.
William F. Buckley, Jr., What Has Happened
to the American Spirit? (Columbia, S.C.: Southern Educational Communications
Association, 1971).
"Best People I Have Ever Known, and Also the Worst, Were
Poets," Mademoiselle, 78 (August 1972): 282-283,
417-420.
John Graham, "James Dickey," in The Writer's
Voice: Conversations with Contemporary Writers, ed. George Garrett
(New York: Morrow, 1973), pp. 228-247.
William Heyen, "A Conversation with James Dickey," Southern Review, 9 (1973): 135-156.
William Packard, ed., The Craft of Poetry:
Interviews from "The New York Quarterly" (Garden City: Doubleday,
1974), pp. 133-151.
J. Cassidy, "Interview with James Dickey," Writer's Digest (October 1974): 16-24.
Donald J. Greiner, "That Plain-Speaking Guy': A Conversation
with James Dickey on Robert Frost," in Frost: Centennial Essays, ed. Jac L. Tharpe, et al (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi,
1974), pp. 51-59.
Carol Flake, "An Interview with James Dickey," Baratraria Review, 1 (1974): 5-11.
David L. Arnett, "An Interview with James Dickey," Contemporary Literature, 16 (Summer 1975): 286-300.
Bill Moyers, A Conversation with James Dickey (New York: WNET/13, Educational Broadcasting Corp., 1976).
Franklin Ashley, "The Art of Poetry XX: James Dickey," Paris Review, 17 (Spring 1976): 52-88.
"'Trash Will Come--You Have to Take the Chance,'" U.S. News and World Report, 80 (15 March 1976): 55-56.
"James Dickey on Carter and the Born-Again South," U.S. News and World Report, 82 (18 April 1977): 67.
W.C. Barnwell, "James Dickey on Yeats: An Interview," Southern Review, 13 (Spring 1977): 311-316.
William W. Starr, "Declarations from Dickey," Columbia, S.C. State, 28 August 1977, sec. E, pp. 1-2.
Matthew J. Bruccoli, "James Dickey," in Conversations with Writers, 1 (Detroit: Bruccoli Clark / Gale Research,
1977), pp. 25-45.
Will Davis, et al, "James Dickey: An Interview," in James Dickey: Splintered Sunlight, ed. Patricia De La Fuente
(Edinburg, Tex.: Pan American University, 1979), pp. 6-23.
Eileen K. Glancy, James Dickey: The Critic
as Poet: An Annotated Bibliography with an Introductory Essay (Troy,
N.Y.: Whitston, 1971).
Franklin Ashley, James Dickey: A Checklist (Columbia, S.C. & Detroit: Bruccoli Clark / Gale Research,
1972).
Jim Elledge, James Dickey: A Bibliography:
1947-1974(Metuchen, N.J. & London: Scarecrow Press, 1979).
Elledge, "James Dickey: A Supplementary Bibliography, 1975-1980:
Part I," Bulletin of Bibliography, 38 (April-June
1981): 92-100, 104.
Elledge, "James Dickey: A Supplementary Bibliography, 1975-1980:
Part II," Bulletin of Bibliography, 38 (July-September
1981): 150-155.
Matthew J. Bruccoli and Judith S. Baughman, James Dickey: A Descriptive Bibliography(Pittsburgh: University
of Pittsburgh Press, 1990).
Peter G. Beidler, "The Pride of Thine Heart Hath Deceived
Thee': Narrative Distortion in Dickey's Deliverance," South
Carolina Review, 5 (December 1972): 29-40.
Robert Bly, "The Work of James Dickey," Sixties, 7 (Winter 1964): 41-57.
Bly, Review of Buckdancer's Choice, Sixties, 9 (1967): 70-79.
Joan Bobbitt, "Unnatural Order in the Poetry of James Dickey," Concerning Poetry, 11 (1978): 39-44.
Richard J. Calhoun, James Dickey (I &
II), cassette tapes no. 175, 176 (DeLand, Fla.: Everett / Edwards,
1971).
Calhoun, ed., James Dickey: The Expansive
Imagination (DeLand, Fla.: Everett / Edwards, 1973).
Calhoun, "After a Long Silence: James Dickey as South Carolina
Writer," South Carolina Review, 9 (November 1976):
12-20.
Paul Carroll, The Poem in its Skin
(Chicago: Big Table, 1968), pp. 40-49.
Patricia De La Fuente, ed., James Dickey:
Splintered Sunlight, Living Author Series, no. 2 (Edinburg, Tex.:
Pan American University, School of Humanities, 1979).
The Voiced Connections of James Dickey: Interviews
and Conversations, edited by Ronald Baughman (Columbia: University
of South Carolina Press, 1989).
Donald J. Greiner, "The Harmony of Bestiality in James Dickey's Deliverance," South Carolina Review, 5 (December 1972): 43-49.
Richard Howard, Alone with America Essays
on the Art of Poetry in the United States Since 1950 (New York:
Atheneum, 1969), pp. 75-98.
Howard, "Resurrection for a Little While," review of The Eye-Beaters, Nation (23 March 1970): 341-342.
Betty Ann Jones, "Jericho: The Marketing Story," in Pages: The World of Books, Writers, and Writing, 1, ed. Matthew
J. Bruccoli and C.E. Frazer Clark, Jr. (Detroit: Gale, 1976), pp. 249-253.
Laurence Lieberman, Unassigned Frequencies:
American Poetry in Review, 1964-77 (Urbana: University of Illinois,
1978), pp. 74-106, 249-251, 263-271.
Karl Malkoff, Crowell's Handbook of Contemporary
American Poetry (New York: Crowell, 1973), pp. 100-108.
Jane Bowers Martin, "'With Eyes Far More Than Human': Transcendence
in the Poetry of James Dickey," M.A. thesis, Clemson University, 1978.
Michael Mesic, "A Note on James Dickey," in American Poetry Since 1960--Some Critical Perspectives, ed. Robert
B. Shaw (Chester Springs, Pa.: Dafour, 1974), pp. 145-153.
Linda Mizejewski, "Shamanism toward Confessionalism: James
Dickey, Poet," Georgia Review, 32 (1978): 409-419.
Harry Morris, "A Formal View of the Poetry of Dickey, Garrigue,
and Simpson," Sewanee Review, 77 (April/June 1969):
318-325.
Howard Nemerov, "James Dickey," in Reflexions
on Poetry and Poetics (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University
Press, 1972), pp. 71-76.
Norman Silverstein, "James Dickey's Muscular Eschatology,"
in Contemporary Poetry in America, ed. Robert Boyars
(New York: Schocken, 1974), pp. 303-313.
South Carolina Review, special
Dickey issue, 10 (April 1978).
Monroe K. Spears, "Poetry Since the Mid-Century," in Dionysus and the City: Modernism in Twentieth-Century Poetry
(New York: Oxford, 1970).
Paul Strong, "James Dickey's Arrow of Deliverance," South Carolina Review, 11 (November 1978): 108-116.
Harry Williams, "The Edge Is What I Have". Theodore Roethke and After (Lewisburg,
Pa.: Bucknell University Press, 1977), pp. 173-183.
About the Essay
Written by: Robert W. Hill, Clemson University
Source: Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 5: American Poets Since World War II, First Series, 1980, pp. 174-191.
(c) 1998 - Gale Research
All Rights Reserved.